Parašė 10.000
Rodyti pranešimą
EKRE (tokia Orbano tipo anti-EU, anti-USA, anti-UA partija LT parlamente būtų sunkiai įsivaizduojama, tuo tarpu EE seime turi 17 vietų iš 101) atstovo Varro Voglaid pasisakymas Estijos seime.
Vėlgi - sunkiai įsivaizduoju tokį pasisakymą LT seime ne iš Gražulio tipo klouno:
Today will go down in the history of Estonia as a great disgrace, because the government, which has rightly been branded as a coalition of liars, is forcibly pushing through the law on the perversion of marriage, which, ignoring the reality of human nature, distorts the meaning of marriage in the law in force in the Republic of Estonia, thereby including homosexual relations and giving homosexuals the right to adopt foreign children.
At a recent parade of so-called sexual minorities in Tallinn, one of the participants carried a slogan that read: "We also want to desecrate the sanctity of marriage!" This is what this bill is all about – the desecration of the sanctity of marriage in the name of the Republic of Estonia. Marital relationships, which are sacred to many people, are lumped together with homosexual relationships, which many consider unclean. In this way, the meaning of marriage as it has been known in Estonia is destroyed.
Obviously, the relationship of many people with the Republic of Estonia is severely damaged in this way, because it is difficult to love and respect a country that behaves in this way. It also screws up social tensions, creates preconditions for an increase in intolerance, and encourages hatred and conflict. It is by no means out of the question that behind hollow slogans is hidden precisely the ambition to divide society and make people quarrel with each other.
At the same time, we know very well that the legalisation of so-called gay marriage is an ideological project that proceeds not from the aim of solving real social problems, but from the goal of reshaping society's value attitudes – to make society not just tolerate homosexual relations (they are already tolerated there), but to approve them, to recognise them as equivalent to marital relations. Of course, we know that the passage of the law will certainly be followed by the introduction of corresponding ideological indoctrination into kindergartens and schools, which will be made instruments of ideological indoctrination.
What is to be deplored, however, is not only the proposed change in the law, but also the deceitful and disrespectful way in which this project will be implemented – without asking and receiving a mandate from voters (i.e. clearly undemocratically), using false slogans and misleading the public (the so-called rhetoric of marriage equality) and, as a matter of urgency, only ostensibly carrying out inclusion.
We recall that only a few years ago, Kaja Kallas confirmed that there is no need to give constitutional protection to the definition of marriage in Estonia, since no political force plans to attack and rewrite the definition of marriage. However, we can now see that the Kallas-led Reform Party is itself one of the forces that is doing just that, having completely silenced the corresponding plan in the run-up to the elections. In other words, the public has been lied to, as in a whole host of other issues.
(...)
Alas, the coalition of liars will not allow itself to be distracted by the Constitution. The members of the Constitutional Assembly have unequivocally asserted that, when drafting the text of the Constitution, it never occurred to anyone to mean anything other than a union between a man and a woman by family. The Ministry of Justice has also recently acknowledged that "at the time when the Constitution was adopted in a referendum, both its drafters and the participants in the referendum understood the spouses specified in § 27 (2) of the Constitution as a man and a woman, because such was the understanding of marriage at that time." Although the Constitution has not been amended, a coalition of liars assumes that the meaning of the Constitution has, as it were, changed in itself – changed in such a way as to be in line with new ideological ambitions. Such an interpretation of the Constitution is simply ridiculous and mocks the idea of the rule of law.
Finally, we conservatives are never going to accept the perversion of the meaning of marriage and family. On the contrary, we are showing complete intransigence in this regard, if necessary through civil disobedience. First, we do not recognize as marriage any association that diverges from the inherent legal meaning of marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Secondly, we resolutely oppose the teaching of the perverse approach to marriage in kindergartens and schools and do not allow our children to participate in school programmes and classes that teach the state-distorted notion of marriage. Thirdly, we regard the decision of the Riigikogu of the Republic of Estonia to redefine marriage as a null and void abuse of state power that deeply divides the people, which we will oppose by all legal means and which we will reverse as soon as possible.
Yes, listen carefully now so that the matter is unequivocally clear: we will reverse your abuse of state power as soon as possible. In doing so, we are not going to listen in the slightest to the talk that this cannot be done. It can. You could turn the meaning of your marriage and family upside down, we can also lift them back on our feet. And believe me: not only can we do it, but we also do it, coldly, because it is our duty – for the simple reason that homosexual relationships have nothing to do with family and marriage.
(...)
At a recent parade of so-called sexual minorities in Tallinn, one of the participants carried a slogan that read: "We also want to desecrate the sanctity of marriage!" This is what this bill is all about – the desecration of the sanctity of marriage in the name of the Republic of Estonia. Marital relationships, which are sacred to many people, are lumped together with homosexual relationships, which many consider unclean. In this way, the meaning of marriage as it has been known in Estonia is destroyed.
Obviously, the relationship of many people with the Republic of Estonia is severely damaged in this way, because it is difficult to love and respect a country that behaves in this way. It also screws up social tensions, creates preconditions for an increase in intolerance, and encourages hatred and conflict. It is by no means out of the question that behind hollow slogans is hidden precisely the ambition to divide society and make people quarrel with each other.
At the same time, we know very well that the legalisation of so-called gay marriage is an ideological project that proceeds not from the aim of solving real social problems, but from the goal of reshaping society's value attitudes – to make society not just tolerate homosexual relations (they are already tolerated there), but to approve them, to recognise them as equivalent to marital relations. Of course, we know that the passage of the law will certainly be followed by the introduction of corresponding ideological indoctrination into kindergartens and schools, which will be made instruments of ideological indoctrination.
What is to be deplored, however, is not only the proposed change in the law, but also the deceitful and disrespectful way in which this project will be implemented – without asking and receiving a mandate from voters (i.e. clearly undemocratically), using false slogans and misleading the public (the so-called rhetoric of marriage equality) and, as a matter of urgency, only ostensibly carrying out inclusion.
We recall that only a few years ago, Kaja Kallas confirmed that there is no need to give constitutional protection to the definition of marriage in Estonia, since no political force plans to attack and rewrite the definition of marriage. However, we can now see that the Kallas-led Reform Party is itself one of the forces that is doing just that, having completely silenced the corresponding plan in the run-up to the elections. In other words, the public has been lied to, as in a whole host of other issues.
(...)
Alas, the coalition of liars will not allow itself to be distracted by the Constitution. The members of the Constitutional Assembly have unequivocally asserted that, when drafting the text of the Constitution, it never occurred to anyone to mean anything other than a union between a man and a woman by family. The Ministry of Justice has also recently acknowledged that "at the time when the Constitution was adopted in a referendum, both its drafters and the participants in the referendum understood the spouses specified in § 27 (2) of the Constitution as a man and a woman, because such was the understanding of marriage at that time." Although the Constitution has not been amended, a coalition of liars assumes that the meaning of the Constitution has, as it were, changed in itself – changed in such a way as to be in line with new ideological ambitions. Such an interpretation of the Constitution is simply ridiculous and mocks the idea of the rule of law.
Finally, we conservatives are never going to accept the perversion of the meaning of marriage and family. On the contrary, we are showing complete intransigence in this regard, if necessary through civil disobedience. First, we do not recognize as marriage any association that diverges from the inherent legal meaning of marriage as the union of a man and a woman. Secondly, we resolutely oppose the teaching of the perverse approach to marriage in kindergartens and schools and do not allow our children to participate in school programmes and classes that teach the state-distorted notion of marriage. Thirdly, we regard the decision of the Riigikogu of the Republic of Estonia to redefine marriage as a null and void abuse of state power that deeply divides the people, which we will oppose by all legal means and which we will reverse as soon as possible.
Yes, listen carefully now so that the matter is unequivocally clear: we will reverse your abuse of state power as soon as possible. In doing so, we are not going to listen in the slightest to the talk that this cannot be done. It can. You could turn the meaning of your marriage and family upside down, we can also lift them back on our feet. And believe me: not only can we do it, but we also do it, coldly, because it is our duty – for the simple reason that homosexual relationships have nothing to do with family and marriage.
(...)
Komentuoti: