Skelbimas

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lietuvių tautinė savimonė ir nacionalinis charakteris. Tautos susiformavimas

Collapse
X
 
  • Filtrai
  • Laikas
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Parašė Tomizmas Rodyti pranešimą
    Šukinės - duobelinės kelramikos kultūra pagrinde yra siejama su ugrofinais, nors irgi yra kitokių alternatyvių teorijų. Virvelinės keramikos kultūra, neabejotinai indoeuropiečių, atėjo čia pora tūkstantmečių vėliau. Bet kokiu atveju, genetika rodo neabejotinai, kad baltai yra maišyti. Kiti indoeuropiečiai, nekontaktavę su ugrofinais (išskyrus rusus ir žymiai mažesniu procentu baltarusius) N neturi.
    Nežinau kiek galima tikėti internetais, bet va teigiama, kad ugrofinai yra vėlyvi ateiviai:
    The native peoples of the East Baltic - Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians - are genetically alike and their paternal gene pools are dominated by the same two Y-chromosome haplogroups: R1a and N3a.

    Linguistically, however, Estonians are a world apart from Latvians and Lithuanians. That's because the Estonian language belongs to the Uralic language family, which has an obvious North Eurasian character. On the other hand, Latvian and Lithuanian are both classified as Indo-European languages, along with the vast majority of other European languages (...)

    (...) basic explanation accepted by most people was that Uralic speech arrived in what is now Estonia and neighboring Finland during the Bronze Age with migrants, or perhaps invaders, rich in N3a from somewhere around the Ural Mountains. Conversely, Latvians and Lithuanians were generally assumed to have retained the Indo-European speech of their R1a-rich forefathers from the Pontic-Caspian steppe, who colonized much of Eastern Europe north of the steppe during the Late Neolithic.
    https://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2019/...-this-way.html
    It's just a circle of people talking to themselves who have no f—ing idea what's going on

    Comment

    Working...
    X