Parašė Lettered
Rodyti pranešimą
Skelbimas
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rusijos karas prieš Ukrainą ir bandymai grasinti NATO
Collapse
X
-
Parašė mag Rodyti pranešimąLyg ir patys lenkai "pasiteisino", kad ištraukta iš konteksto ambasadoriaus žodžiai
Comment
-
Parašė digital Rodyti pranešimąNe - pasiteisino, kad nesakė "paskelbs karą"; bet sakė, kad įsitrauks, ir šito nepaneiginėjo.
Comment
-
Parašė Gator Rodyti pranešimąĮsitrauks savo iniciatyva, ar kaip mano pacituotam komentare - teks įsitraukti, nes Rusija nesustos ties Ukraina ir pati eis į Lenkiją?Snowflakes will attack U <3
Comment
-
Siuzerenas liepia dirbti ir toliau, ką padarysi teks ir toliau būti prezidentu. Xi neabejoja, kad rusai pu "išrinks" prezidentu 2024 metais, nors tas dar niekaip nepasakė, kad pretenduos
Chinese President Xi Jinping told President Vladimir Putin on Monday that he was convinced Russians would support him in a presidential election due in 2024, even though the Kremlin chief has not yet said if he will seek another term.
- 2 patinka
Comment
-
Parašė suoliuojantis Rodyti pranešimąSiuzerenas liepia dirbti ir toliau, ką padarysi teks ir toliau būti prezidentu. Xi neabejoja, kad rusai pu "išrinks" prezidentu 2024 metais, nors tas dar niekaip nepasakė, kad pretenduos
Chinese President Xi Jinping told President Vladimir Putin on Monday that he was convinced Russians would support him in a presidential election due in 2024, even though the Kremlin chief has not yet said if he will seek another term.
Comment
-
Parašė Tomizmas Rodyti pranešimąMinimum iki 2030 metų bus įdomybių Rimtai, jau kyla nors galvoti apie nekilnojamą turtą Turkijoje.
- 8 patinka
Comment
-
Parašė Tomizmas Rodyti pranešimąMinimum iki 2030 metų bus įdomybių Rimtai, jau kyla nors galvoti apie nekilnojamą turtą Turkijoje.
- 5 patinka
Comment
-
Parašė Tomizmas Rodyti pranešimąMinimum iki 2030 metų bus įdomybių Rimtai, jau kyla nors galvoti apie nekilnojamą turtą Turkijoje.
Comment
-
Parašė Obi-Wan Kenobi Rodyti pranešimą
Ispanija, turbūt, geriausias variantas
Parašė Obi-Wan Kenobi Rodyti pranešimąŠiandien viešinama VSD parengta geopolitinių grėsmių ataskaita. Ten aiškiai parašyta - mums liko apie 5 metus. Po to - karas su Rusija. Butai brangz.
Comment
-
Kadangi užsivedė kalba apie kinus įdomus interviu su viena iš kinų kalbančių galvų. Buvęs kariškis, o dabar vaizduojantis nepriklausomą ekspertą ir kalbantis Miuncheno saugumo konferencijose ir panašiuose renginiuose. Paskaityt įdomu, pratinkitės prie rytietiškos demagogijos, kaip jis vartosi, kad Kinija visai neutrali ir objektyvi šiame kare ... Šiaip keletas įdomių vietų, kurie gal kažkiek išduoda Kinijos požiūrį ir supratimą. Sorry už labai ilgas citatas, bet man tai labai svarbu atrodo. Akivaizdu, kad nepaisant visų šnekų ši šalis akivaizdžiai simpatizuoja vienai pusei:
Do you think Russia made a strategic mistake invading Ukraine? Do you think Russia is weaker now than before the invasion?
I don’t believe so far Russia has regretted this war, but I think they would regret the way they fought the war. They did not fight it well, especially at the beginning when they dispersed their armed forces in attacking from too many directions. The communications and logistical supply were poor; the command chain would start from Moscow, but there was no front commander post. Putting all this together, it was not as good as they wished. But about the war itself it is not as straightforward, because for Putin, this involves the existence of Russia itself.
Let me insist on whether China has been neutral. Why has China refused to call the war a war? Should a superpower be afraid to call things by their names?
China does have some sympathy with Russia on how this war came about because of NATO expansion, despite NATO’s promises on no expansion from time to time. When people talk about a murder, the murder is only a result, but it has causes. China understands why Russia is resentful. When China stresses sovereignty must be respected, it also tries to look at it from a more comprehensive perspective. Countries like South Africa, Brazil, or India are taking similar positions like China on this.
Why has President Xi not talked to President Zelensky? I asked Ukrainian Foreign Minister Kuleba last week and he was perplexed. A neutral country has to speak to both sides.
Because this situation is so complicated. Russia is our largest neighbour, and Ukraine is an important trade partner, it is difficult for China to make a choice. Besides, the all-out support in the West for Ukraine makes things more complicated. There is no doubt that China wants to see a ceasefire because China’s interests were damaged in Europe. Because of China’s neutrality, China’s relations with Western capitals have soured. This is ludicrous because China has nothing to do with this war. China was not informed, China was not involved, but now people simply want China to be involved and pick a side.
You said China and Russia have a close relationship. If Russia was on the brink of being defeated then supplying weapons might make sense?
No. Your scenario is impossible. Russia cannot win this war, but Russia won’t lose this war either. Because of Russia’s size, because of its strength including its largest nuclear arsenal in the world and because Russia cannot afford to withdraw. And because there might even be changes in the West on supporting Ukraine. Will support continue if it turns out to be a war of attrition?
If there is a peace agreement, what are the foundations for such an agreement. Does it involve Russia’s withdrawal from Ukraine or does it include territorial negotiations and concessions?
Actually we had a conversations in the Valdai Club this afternoon and I asked the same question. The problem is how these two countries can find a solution. Right now, for both of them, the solution is total victory. So the war will simply last. China stands ready when it can help, but only these countries can solve the issue, they have to come to a ceasefire first. For Russia, it at least needs some victory. If eventually Russia could only put Crimea that it occupied in 2014 under control, why does Putin need to launch the war at all? Zelensky said victory is inevitable if allies keep their promise. That means he does have concerns that the allies may not keep their promise, especially if this war turns out to be a war of attrition. The U.S. has already made it clear that it doesn’t want a ceasefire asserting that a ceasefire now actually ratifies Russia’s gains on the ground.
https://time.com/6264512/insiders-pe...gy-in-ukraine/
- 1 patinka
Comment
-
Šiandien vieno opozicionieriaus kanale išgirdau frazę, kuri labai taikliai apibūdina situaciją:
"rusija dabar nuo Kinijos priklauso taip pat, kaip Čiaušesku priklausė nuo TSRS"
Opozicionieriai gana rimtai kalba, kad didžiausia plotu valstybė akivaizdžiai prarado suverenitetą.
Didžiojo stratego mnogochodovka pavyko! Tiek bijojo NATO raketų, kad gražiuoju atsidavė kitam. O Kinija, reikia pripažinti, žaidžia profesionaliai* - vykdo "specoperacijas", ima valstybes be šūvio, be jokio nereikalingo triukšmo, jokių "Za rodinu, Za prezidenta, svajich ne brosajem" ir kitų bereikalingų frazių**. Kažkas dar šneka, kad Sibirą Kinija atims... O kam Kinijai Sibiras, kai galima turėti rusiją? Rankas dar teptis, mobilizuotus gyventojus siųsti kaip mėsą? Tegul lūzeriai taip daro, jie pasižiūrės ir pasijuoks.
_________________________
* profesionalumas ir moralumas nebūtinai yra koreliuojančios sąvokos.
** kažkodėl įtariu, kad Kinijos politikams tie emocingi riksmai "za rodinu, za svojich" turėtų skambėti kaip primityvios genties karo klyksmai, su būgnais ir deglais.Paskutinis taisė Tomizmas; 2023.03.21, 23:37.Snowflakes will attack U <3
Comment
Comment