Dėl Kinijos tai taip, tušti žodžiai ir tiek. Va ką Kinijos premjeras pagal Reuters kalbėjo dar jau tolimais 2015 metais:
“On the issue of Ukraine, China has adopted an objective and just position. We respect Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity,” Li told a news conference at the end of the annual meeting of parliament, adding that he had recently told this to Ukraine’s president.
“At the same time, the Ukraine issue has added to the complexity of the geopolitical situation and has affected the process of the global economic recovery. We still hope that this issue can be resolved via dialogue, negotiations and consultations,” Li added.
Nu ir ? Po to ir visokie Sila Sibiri, ir daugybė bendrų vizitų, kinų investicijos net Kryme, bendri su Xujlo kariniai manevrai, nebyli arba net ir garsi parama Kremliui, nekalbant apie tai kiek kartų Kinija (žinoma ne be naudos sau) atėjo ekonomiškai rusams sunkiu metu į pagalbą.
Beje vos 2013 metais tapęs Kinijos vadovu Xi pirmo vizito nulėkė pas putleriuką. Ko niekad nėra buvę (neskaitant pokarinio periodo), Sako dar nuo 200x metų Xi pradėjo žavėtis kremliniu.
Beje dar 2015 metais Pekino dvaro politologas Zhang Lihua aiškino kodėl Kinija vengia atvirai smerkti Rusiją dėl Krymo. Tai beje anot jų dėl "dvigubų Vakarų standartų" ir tiesiogiai susiję su mumis:
Western countries’ dismissal of the Crimean referendum last March does not appear consistent with their positions on similar votes held by former Soviet territories. For instance, the United States and Western Europe supported and quickly recognized Ukraine’s and Georgia’s independence referendums in 1991, when they separated from the Soviet Union as it was experiencing upheaval. The West also actively backed Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania when these former Soviet territories established independence in the early 1990s. In doing so, the United States and its European allies likely accelerated the Soviet Union’s disintegration.
https://carnegieendowment.org/2015/0...ndum-pub-59600
“On the issue of Ukraine, China has adopted an objective and just position. We respect Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity,” Li told a news conference at the end of the annual meeting of parliament, adding that he had recently told this to Ukraine’s president.
“At the same time, the Ukraine issue has added to the complexity of the geopolitical situation and has affected the process of the global economic recovery. We still hope that this issue can be resolved via dialogue, negotiations and consultations,” Li added.
Nu ir ? Po to ir visokie Sila Sibiri, ir daugybė bendrų vizitų, kinų investicijos net Kryme, bendri su Xujlo kariniai manevrai, nebyli arba net ir garsi parama Kremliui, nekalbant apie tai kiek kartų Kinija (žinoma ne be naudos sau) atėjo ekonomiškai rusams sunkiu metu į pagalbą.
Beje vos 2013 metais tapęs Kinijos vadovu Xi pirmo vizito nulėkė pas putleriuką. Ko niekad nėra buvę (neskaitant pokarinio periodo), Sako dar nuo 200x metų Xi pradėjo žavėtis kremliniu.
Beje dar 2015 metais Pekino dvaro politologas Zhang Lihua aiškino kodėl Kinija vengia atvirai smerkti Rusiją dėl Krymo. Tai beje anot jų dėl "dvigubų Vakarų standartų" ir tiesiogiai susiję su mumis:
Western countries’ dismissal of the Crimean referendum last March does not appear consistent with their positions on similar votes held by former Soviet territories. For instance, the United States and Western Europe supported and quickly recognized Ukraine’s and Georgia’s independence referendums in 1991, when they separated from the Soviet Union as it was experiencing upheaval. The West also actively backed Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania when these former Soviet territories established independence in the early 1990s. In doing so, the United States and its European allies likely accelerated the Soviet Union’s disintegration.
https://carnegieendowment.org/2015/0...ndum-pub-59600
Comment